Here is an
interesting perspective
on the recent incident at the G-8 summit on Monday, in which a private conversation
between George Bush and Tony Blair, was picked up by a microphone, unintentionally
left on. The author makes some good arguments that while the mainstream media has put
a positive spin on this accidental broadcast of insider information, that the
conversation actually reveals darker motives.
Personally, I believe that this was not an “unintentional” incident at all—rather,
this was a carefully orchestrated event intended to re-inforce programming which justifies
future conflicts with Syria and Iran. Here is the
full transcript
of the conversation.
What I can't figure out is why George drinks Diet Coke, as revealed by the exchange. Surely he knows that s——t is
pure poison. Then again, if it’s
good enough for the Secretary of Defense,
then Bush must approve.
Posted: 07/20/2006 9:54 PM
Permalink | Comments [1]
In the latest chapter in the campaign for world dominance, the globalists have opted to stir up conflict between Hezbollah and Israel, perhaps as a stepping stone in their declared path towards a conflict with Iran.
In this clearly planned series of events, we observe two agressors, pitted against each other in bloody acts of terrorism.
The pretext behind this is that Hezbollah started matters, by murdering and kidnapping Israeli soldiers.
Israel’s retaliation was to deliver a massive bombing campaign unto Lebanon, in which mostly civilians were murdered, including children. Hezbollah retaliates by firing rockets into Israeli neighborhoods, killing Israeli civilians…
The conflict comes down to this—two separate groups of terrorists, created and controlled by one entity—the globalists, are wreaking havoc, and hundreds
of civilians have already been slaughtered (about 200 Lebanese and 13 Israelies).
According to Webster,
“terrorism” is defined as
“the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion”. If we follow up with the definiton for terror, we see that “terror” refers not only to “a state of intense fear”, but also “violent or destructive acts (as bombing) committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into granting their demands”. Such definitions describe both sides of this conflict to the letter.
If we examine the clues in the Illuminati-controlled media, we notice several clues as to their motives. Several
ideas are being progagated through these media outlets to draw out specific emotional responses in viewers:
-
While deaths and kidnappings are unacceptable, Israel's response has been
disproportionate—that is, Israel's reaction has involved the same terrorist actions that
Hezbollah took, but on a much larger scale. In this disproportionate response, Israel has primarially
killed innocent Lebanese civilians, including children.
-
Bush makes comments such as
“ ‘Syria is trying to get back into Lebanon, it looks like
to me’…‘It’s essential that the government of Lebanon survives this crisis.
We’ve worked hard to free - and we meaning the international community - worked hard to free Lebanon
from Syrian influence.’ ” Source:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5192990.stm
This programming is meant to instill an emotional reaction in observers, programming them to believe the following:
- This conflict was not started by Lebanon, but by “terrorists”
-
Israel had no choice but to react as they did. However, they have reacted too strongly, and they are
causing massive collateral damage in Lebanon, who we are reminded,
are a “free” or “good” country.
-
These “terrorists” are ultimately funded by Syria and Iran.
-
Thus, ultimately, a war with Syria and/or Iran is necessary to protect the “good” and
“free” countries.
It is exactly this type of programming that was used to start a war in Iraq, and the world widely fell for it then.
The question is, are those same people going to be duped yet again?
Posted: 07/19/2006 4:45 PM
Permalink | Comments [0]